Not all roles available for this page.
Sign in to view assessments and invite other educators
Sign in using your existing Kendall Hunt account. If you don’t have one, create an educator account.
This Warm-up activates ideas about rates and constant speed before students solve problems about them later in the lesson. Students are presented with a situation with some numerical values and prompted to develop mathematical questions that can be asked about the situation. The routine allows students to make sense of a context before feeling pressure to produce answers, and it develops students’ awareness of the language used in mathematics problems.
Tell students to close their books or devices (or to keep them closed). Arrange students in groups of 2. Remind students of the context of running on a treadmill, which they had encountered in an earlier unit. Use Co-Craft Questions to orient students to the context and to elicit possible mathematical questions.
Give students 1–2 minutes to write a list of mathematical questions that could be asked about the situation before comparing questions with a partner.
Some students did treadmill workouts.
Invite several partners to share one question with the class, and record responses. Ask the class to make comparisons among the shared questions and their own. Ask, “What do these questions have in common? How are they different?” Listen for and amplify language related to the learning goal, such as “constant speed,” “at the same rate,” and “ meters per hour (or minute).”
Tell students that they will now look more closely at Tyler's, Kiran's, and Mai’s workouts and compare them.
In this activity, students analyze the workouts of several people on a treadmill given time-distance ratios, and they work toward more efficient ways to compare speeds, namely, by computing rates per 1. Students see that when such ratios can be expressed with the same number of meters per minute (or per hour), the ratios are equivalent and the moving objects (such as people or cars) have the same speed.
Speed is typically expressed as a distance per 1 unit of time, so the context lends itself for comparing rates per 1. The numbers have been chosen such that any two workouts being compared have the same time, same distance, or same speed.
Encourage students to use “per 1” and “for each” language throughout, as this language supports the development of the concept of unit rate.
As students discuss the problems, listen closely for those who use these terms as well as descriptions of speed (such as “same speed,” “faster,” or “slower”). Also monitor for students who first make the connections between the rates per 1 that they calculated in the first half of the task and then use them to answer questions in the second half. Invite some of these students or groups to share later.
Arrange students in groups of 3. Give students 2–3 minutes of quiet think time to complete the first set of questions (comparisons of pairs of workouts) and then time to discuss their responses. Specify that each group member should take the lead on analyzing one sub-problem and sharing how the workouts of the two given runners are similar or different.
Afterward, ask students to complete the remainder of the task with their group.
Some students did treadmill workouts, each one running at a constant speed. Answer the questions about their workouts. Explain or show your reasoning.
What is the same about the workouts done by:
If students are not sure how to begin, suggest that they try using a table or a double number line diagram that associates meters and minutes.
Focus the conversation on the speed of each runner and the idea of “same speed,” including clues that two objects are moving equally fast or slow. Ask questions such as:
Invite a few students to share their analyses of how the runners compare, starting with how Tyler's workout compares to Kiran's, and how Kiran's compares to Mai's. Descriptions such as “slower,” “faster,” or “higher or lower speed” should begin to emerge.
After students share their analyses of Mai's and Tyler's workouts, emphasize that even though they ran different distances in different amounts of time, they each ran 140 meters per minute (or 8,400 meters per hour), so we can say “they ran at the same speed.” This also means that Mai and Tyler's original ratios— and —are equivalent ratios.
In the last problem, students need to understand that since Mai and Tyler ran at the same speed they traveled the same distance for the first 30 minutes on the treadmill. This may be difficult for students to articulate with precision, so allowing multiple students to share their thinking may be beneficial.
In this activity, students compare rates per 1 in a shopping context as they look for “the best deal.” The work reminds students how unit price works and encourages them to look for efficient ways to compare unit prices.
The phrase “the best deal” may have different meanings to students and should be discussed. For instance, students may account for various factors besides price, such as distance to store, transportation costs, store preference, loyalty points, and range of item selections and sizes in a store. Discussing these real-life considerations, and choosing which to prioritize and which to disregard, is an important part of modeling with mathematics (MP4). For the purposes of this activity, however, it is also appropriate to clarify that we are looking for “the best deal” in the sense of the lowest cost per can.
As students work, monitor for students who use representations like double number line diagram or tables of equivalent ratios. These are useful for making sense of a strategy that divides the price by the number of cans to find the price per 1. Also monitor for students using more efficient strategies, such as dividing price by the number of cans or the number of ounces.
Tell students that this activity is about finding the best deal when shopping for a grocery item. Ask students to share what “a good deal” and “the best deal” mean to them. Many students are likely to interpret these in terms of low prices (per item or otherwise) or “getting more for less money,” but some may have other practical or personal considerations. (For example, it is not a good deal to pay less for a large amount of food but not be able to consume it before it spoils, or to have to travel a long distance to the store or pay more for transportation.) Acknowledge students’ perspectives and how “messy” such seemingly simple terms can be. Clarify that in this task, we are looking for “the best deal” in the sense of the lowest cost per can.
Give students 6–8 minutes of quiet work time, and follow that with a whole-class discussion. Clarify that “oz” is an abbreviation for “ounce.”
Four different stores posted ads about special sales on 15-oz cans of baked beans.
Which store is offering the best deal? Explain your reasoning.
Store D is also selling 28-oz cans of baked beans for \$1.40 each. How does that price compare to the other prices?
The purpose of this discussion is to help students see that computing and comparing the price per 1 is an efficient way to compare rates in a price context.
Select students who supported their reasoning with a double number line diagram or table to share their responses first. Keep these representations visible and make connections with subsequent explanations from students who used more efficient strategies. Highlight the use of division to compute the price per can and the use of “per 1” language.
To summarize the different ways that ratios in situations can be expressed as rates per 1, display the given ratios in each activity and the associated rates per 1, as shown here.
From the activities about running on a treadmill:
| given ratio | rate per 1 |
|---|---|
| 4,200 meters in 30 minutes |
140 meters per minute or 8,400 meters per hour |
| 6,300 meters in 30 minutes |
210 meters per minute or 12,600 meters per hour |
| 6.3 kilometers in 45 minutes |
140 meters per minute or 8,400 meters per hour |
From the activity about finding the best deal:
| given ratio | rate per 1 |
|---|---|
| 8 cans for \$6 | \$0.75 per can |
| 10 cans for \$10 | \$1.00 per can |
| 2 cans for \$3 | \$1.50 per can |
| 80 cents per can | \$0.80 per can |
Give students some quiet time to read through the list. Then ask questions such as:
Diego ran 3 kilometers in 20 minutes. Andre ran 2,550 meters in 17 minutes. Who ran faster? Since neither their distances nor their times are the same, we have two possible strategies:
Find the time each person took to travel the same distance. The person who traveled that distance in less time is faster.
Find the distance each person traveled in the same time. The person who traveled a longer distance in the same amount of time is faster.
It is often helpful to compare distances traveled in 1 unit of time (1 minute, for example), which means finding the speed, such as meters per minute.
Let’s compare Diego and Andre’s speeds in meters per minute.
Both Diego and Andre ran 150 meters per minute, so they ran at the same speed.
Finding ratios that tell us how much of quantity per 1 unit of quantity is an efficient way to compare rates in different situations. Here are some familiar examples:
Fruit and vegetable prices in dollars per pound.
Students may look only at the number of cans in each offer or only at the price. For example, they may say that the deal offered by Store D is the best one because it is the only price that is under \$1. Ask students how many cans 80 cents buys at that store and whether the other prices shown are also for that many cans. Ask them how they might compare the prices for the same number of cans rather than for different numbers of cans.